THE EFFECTS OF EDUCATIONAL EXPERIENCES IN PERSONALITY CHARACTERISTIC DEVELOPMENT
BY
JOSHUA J. JACKSON
FEUILLE
Submitted in partial happiness of the requirements
for the level of Doctor of Philosophy in Psychology
in the Graduate College or university of the
College or university of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2011
Urbana, Illinois
Tragique Committee:
Professor Brent Roberts, Chair
Affiliate Professor 3rd there’s r. Chris Fraley
Professor Eva Pomerantz
Mentor Jim Times
Associate Professor Edelyn Verona
ii
SUMMARY
Recent study suggests that educational experiences cause positive final results for factors other than increases in intellectual abilities. Specifically, non-cognitive expertise (i. at the. personality traits) may change as a result of educational experiences (Heckman et approach., 2010). As of yet, the idea that educational experiences lead to changes in nature has received little or no empirical support. The current examine examines the relationship between educational experiences and personality trait development within a large The german language sample across four ocean beginning in senior high school and during college. Conclusions suggest that personality traits in senior high school predict the kind of educational experience students possess in university. Secondly, numerous educational encounters are associated with changes in personality traits. For example , going to class and spending more time on a person's homework can be associated with boosts in conscientiousness while having fewer stressful experience are linked to decreases in neuroticism. Similarly, changes in educational experiences happen to be associated with within personality traits, recommending a reciprocal relationship between educational experience and nature. Finally, several auto-regressive and auto-regressive valuable trajectory (ALT) models discovered evidence that educational activities can lead to within personality traits and vice-versa. Overall, this study suggests that educational contexts are crucial for the introduction of personality traits. Looked at in this light, one discovers more in school than just category material.
iii
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
My spouse and i am forever indebted to my unequalled advisor, colleague, and good friend, Brent Roberts. He had taken a young, naГЇve, wannabe man of science and flipped him right into a slightly less young and naГЇve scientist (Who said you can not change persona? ). His openmindedness, work ethics, and ability to integrate diverse theories are all qualities I actually strive for. Thank you for all of your advice and support.
My whole academic job would not be possible without the assistance of your number of individuals during my time in UW-Madison. Due to PPD Laboratory at the Psychiatric Department for giving me personally my initial taste of any longitudinal examine (and for making it very clear that my own interests weren't in scientific psychology), to Jeremy Biesanz for presenting me to personality psychology and for instilling a love of figures, and finally to Avshalom Caspi, who in a short amount of time left an marked mark along the way I strategy science. Many thanks also go to Ulrich Trautwein and Oliver LГјdtke, who were my thoughtful hosts during a summer in Germany, and allowed myself access to the TOSCA dataset. I learned a great deal coming from both of them within a short amount of time and may never forget the knowledge. I would also like to thank my tragique committee, Frank Fraley, Avoi Pomerantz, John Rounds, and Edelyn Verona for all of their particular helpful input into the feuille. Special bless you goes to Jenessa Sprague, who has provided support, encouragement, and a welcome distraction through the dissertation procedure. You keep me personally sane, motivated, and liked. Finally, I would really prefer to thank my parents and sister for their everlasting support and reassurance. Their motivation to allow me to follow whatever hit my interest paved the way pertaining to the person We am today.
iv
TABLE OF CONTENTS
LIST OF TABLES…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………vi LIST OF...
Sources: Abe, J. A. A. (2005). The predictive worth of the Five-Factor Model of individuality with preschool
age kids: A 9 year a muslim study, Log of Study in Character, 39, 423–
Ackerman, P. L., & Heggestad, Elizabeth. D. (1997). Intelligence, individuality, and passions: Evidence pertaining to
overlapping characteristics
Allemand, M., Gomez, V., & Knutson, J. J. (2010). Character Trait Creation in Midlife:
Exploring the Effect of Psychological Turning Points
Allemand, Meters., Zimprich, G., & Hertzog, C. (2007). Cross-sectional age differences and
longitudinal age changes of personality in middle adult life and old age
Baltes, S. B. (1997). On the imperfect architecture of human ontogeny. American
Psychologist, 52, 366–380.
Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, G. V., Rabasca, A., & Pastorelli, C. (2003). A questionnaire for
measuring the top Five at the end of childhood
Biderman, M. M., Nguyen, And. T., & Sobren, M. (2008). Time-on-task mediates the
conscientiousness–performance romantic relationship
Bollen, K. A., & Curran, G. J. (2004). Autoregressive valuable trajectory (ALT) models: A synthesis
of two practices
Borkenau, S., & Ostendorf, F. (1993). NEO-FГјnf-Faktoren Inventar nach Puerto und McCrae.
Bratko, M., Chamorro-Premuzic, Capital t., & Saks, Z. (2006). Personality and school overall performance:
Incremental validity of self- and peer-ratings over brains
Caspi, A., & Bastante, D. L. (1990). Personality continuity and alter across the life course. In L. A.
Caspi A, and Moffitt TE (1993). When do specific differences subject? A paradoxical theory
of personality accordance
Chamorro-Premuzic, To., & Furnham, A. (2003). Personality forecasts academic efficiency:
Evidence by two longitudinal university selections
Chamorro-Premuzic, Big t., & Furnham, A. (2008). Personality, intellect and approaches to
learning because predictors of academic performance
44, 1596в€’1603.
Cheng, H., & Furnham, A. (2002). Personality, peer associations, and self-confidence as predictors
of joy and isolation
Conard, Meters. A. (2006). Aptitude can be not enough: How personality and behavior foresee academic
functionality
Cooper, H., Robinson, J. C., & Pattall, Elizabeth. A. (2006). Does home work improve educational
achievement? A synthesis of research 1987–2003
Costa, L. T., Junior., Herbst, L. H., McCrae, R. L., & Siegler, I. C. (2000). Character at midlife:
Stability, innate motivation, and responses alive events
Bahia, P. T., & McCrae, R. 3rd there’s r. (1992). Revised NEO Character Inventory (NEO PI-R) and NEO Five
Factor Products on hand (NEO-FFI)
Crede, M., & Kuncel, And. R. (2008). Study behaviors, skills, and attitudes: The third pillar assisting
collegiate academic performance
Curran, P. J. (2003). Have multilevel types been structural equation models all
along? Multivariate Behavioral Research, 35, 529-569.
Sobre Raad, W., & Schouwenburg, H. C. (1986). Individuality in learning and education: An assessment.
Diseth, A. (2003). Persona and methods to learning as predictors of academic
achievement
Dollinger, S. J., & Orf, L. A. (1991). Individuality and performance in вЂвЂpersonality'':
Conscientiousness and openness
Duckworth, A., Seligman, Meters. (2005). Self-discipline outdoes IQ in predicting academic
efficiency of adolescents
Duckworth, A. L., Tsukayama, E. & May, L. (2010). Creating causality employing longitudinal
hierarchical linear building: An model predicting accomplishment from selfcontrol
Duff, A., Boyle, Electronic., Dunleavy, E., & Ferguson, J. (2004). The relationship among personality,
method of learning and academic efficiency
36, 1907в€’1920.
Furnham, A., & Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2004). Personality and intelligence as predictors of
statistics exam grades
Furr, R. M. (2009). Character psychology being a truly behavioral science. Euro Journal of
Personality, 3, 369-401.
Graziano, W. G., Hair, Electronic. C., & Finch, L. F. (1997). Competitiveness mediates the link between
personality and group performance
Gottfredson, G. D., Smith, E. Meters., & The netherlands, J. L. (1993). Character and professional interests:
The relation of Holland's six interest measurements to five robust measurements of
Goldin, C., & Katz D. F. (2008). The Race between Education and Technology. Cambridge, MUM:
Harvard University or college Press.
